Trials
How It Works
Overview of Trials
Definition:
A trial is a formal legal proceeding where the prosecution and defence present evidence and arguments to determine whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the charges. Trials can be conducted before a judge alone (judge-only trial) or before a judge and jury (jury trial).
Purpose:
Determination of Guilt or Innocence: The primary purpose of a trial is to determine whether the accused committed the alleged offence beyond a reasonable doubt.
Adjudication of Disputes: Trials serve as a forum for resolving disputes between the prosecution and defence, ensuring that justice is administered fairly and according to the law.
Legal Framework for Trials
Criminal Code of Canada:
Sections 530-546: The Criminal Code provides detailed guidelines on the trial process, including the rights of the accused, procedures for presenting evidence, and rules for conducting trials.
Constitutional Rights:
Right to a Fair Trial: Under Section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, every person accused of an offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal.
Types of Trials
-
Judge-Only Trial:
Definition: A trial where the judge alone determines the facts and makes the decision on guilt or innocence.
When Used: Typically used for less serious offences or when the accused elects to have a trial without a jury.
-
Jury Trial:
Definition: A trial where a group of citizens (the jury) listens to the evidence and makes a decision on guilt or innocence, while the judge oversees the legal aspects of the trial and sentencing.
When Used: Typically used for more serious offences, such as murder, where the accused has the right to a jury trial.
The Trial Process
Opening Statements:
Prosecution’s Opening Statement: The prosecution begins by outlining the case against the accused, summarizing the evidence they will present to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Defence’s Opening Statement: The defence may choose to provide an opening statement, explaining their theory of the case and how they plan to challenge the prosecution’s evidence.
Closing Arguments:
Prosecution’s Closing Argument: After all evidence is presented, the prosecution summarizes their case, emphasizing the evidence that supports a guilty verdict. They argue why the evidence meets the legal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Defence’s Closing Argument: The defence summarizes their case, highlighting any doubts or weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence and arguing why the accused should be acquitted.
Presentation of Evidence:
Prosecution’s Case: The prosecution presents its evidence first, calling witnesses, submitting documents, and introducing physical evidence. Each witness is subject to direct examination by the prosecution and cross-examination by the defence.
Defence’s Case: After the prosecution closes, the defence may elect to present evidence, calling witnesses and introducing evidence to challenge the prosecution’s case or support a defence. The defence may also choose not to present evidence if they believe the prosecution has not proven the case.
Judge’s Instructions (in Jury Trials):
Legal Guidance: In a jury trial, the judge provides instructions to the jury on the relevant law, the burden of proof, and how to evaluate the evidence. The judge’s instructions are crucial for guiding the jury’s decision-making process.
Cross-Examination:
Purpose: Cross-examination allows the opposing side to challenge the credibility, reliability, and accuracy of the witnesses and evidence presented. It is a critical part of the trial process, helping to uncover inconsistencies or weaknesses in the evidence.
Deliberation and Verdict:
Judge-Only Trial: In a judge-only trial, the judge deliberates on the evidence and renders a verdict of guilty or not guilty.
Jury Trial: In a jury trial, the jury deliberates in private, considering the evidence and reaching a unanimous verdict. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, the judge may declare a mistrial, leading to a retrial or other legal resolutions.
Role of the Defence Lawyer in
Trials.
1. Advocacy:
Vigorous Defence: The defence lawyer’s primary role is to provide a strong and effective defence, challenging the prosecution’s evidence, cross-examining witnesses, and presenting counter-evidence to create reasonable doubt.
Legal Strategy: The defence lawyer develops a trial strategy based on the facts of the case, legal precedents, and the specific circumstances of the accused. They may choose to focus on discrediting the prosecution’s evidence, presenting an alternative explanation, or raising defences such as self-defence or alibi.
2. Client Representation:
Protecting Rights: The defence lawyer ensures that the accused’s rights are protected throughout the trial, including the right to remain silent, the right to a fair trial, and the right to be present during all proceedings.
Communication: The defence lawyer keeps the accused informed about the trial process, the evidence presented, and the potential outcomes. They provide guidance on important decisions, such as whether the accused should testify in their own defence.
Evidence and Legal Standards in Trials
-
Burden of Proof:
Prosecution’s Burden: In criminal trials, the prosecution bears the burden of proving the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a high legal standard, requiring the prosecution to convince the judge or jury that there is no reasonable doubt about the accused’s guilt.
Defence’s Role: The defence does not have to prove the accused’s innocence; instead, they aim to create reasonable doubt in the prosecution’s case.
-
Rules of Evidence:
Admissibility: The trial process is governed by strict rules of evidence, determining what evidence can be presented in court. Evidence must be relevant, reliable, and not overly prejudicial to be admissible.
Objections: The defence and prosecution can object to certain evidence or testimony if they believe it violates the rules of evidence. The judge rules on these objections, deciding whether the evidence can be admitted.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Trials
-
Advantages:
Full Examination of Evidence: Trials provide a thorough examination of the evidence, allowing both sides to present their case and challenge the opposition’s evidence.
Opportunity for Defence: The accused has the opportunity to present their defence, cross-examine witnesses, and challenge the prosecution’s case, ensuring that all relevant facts are considered.
Legal Precedent: Trials contribute to the development of legal precedent, as judges issue rulings on legal issues that may guide future cases.
-
Disadvantages:
Length and Complexity: Trials can be lengthy, complex, and expensive, requiring significant time and resources from both the defence and prosecution.
Uncertainty: Trials carry the risk of an uncertain outcome, as the decision is in the hands of the judge or jury, and there are no guarantees of acquittal.
Emotional Stress: Trials can be emotionally stressful for the accused, witnesses, and victims, particularly in cases involving serious crimes.
Impact of Trials on the Accused and the Community
1. Impact on the Accused:
Legal Consequences: If convicted, the accused faces legal consequences such as imprisonment, fines, probation, or other penalties. A conviction can also have long-term consequences, such as a criminal record and difficulties with employment or travel.
Emotional and Financial Strain: The trial process can be emotionally and financially draining for the accused and their family, particularly if the trial is prolonged or involves serious charges.
2. Impact on the Community:
Public Interest: Trials serve the public interest by ensuring that criminal cases are resolved transparently and according to the law. They provide a forum for addressing criminal behaviour and upholding justice in the community.
Community Involvement: In jury trials, members of the community play a direct role in the justice system, contributing to the decision-making process and ensuring that justice is administered by peers.
The Role of the Judge and Jury
1. Judge:
Legal Authority: The judge oversees the trial, ensuring that it is conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. The judge rules on legal issues, objections, and admissibility of evidence, and provides instructions to the jury in jury trials.
Verdict (Judge-Only Trials): In judge-only trials, the judge also acts as the fact-finder, determining whether the prosecution has proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
2. Jury:
Fact-Finders: In a jury trial, the jury is responsible for determining the facts of the case based on the evidence presented. They assess the credibility of witnesses, weigh the evidence, and decide whether the prosecution has met the burden of proof.
Unanimous Verdict: In criminal trials, the jury must reach a unanimous verdict (all jurors must agree) to convict or acquit the accused. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, the judge may declare a mistrial.